Complete Guide to Ambient Fume Extraction

Ambient Filtration vs. Source Capture: What's the Difference?

When discussing air filtration strategies, it's crucial to distinguish between ambient and source capture methods, as each serves a different function within industrial safety protocols. The key difference between ambient and source capture methods in air filtration lies in where and how the contaminants are collected.
  • Source Capture: Source capture involves collecting contaminants (like dust, fumes, smoke, etc.) directly at their point of origin before they disperse into the air. This is done using devices like extraction arms, hoods, or local exhaust ventilation systems placed close to where the emissions are generated. This method is highly effective at preventing pollutants from entering the workplace environment, as it captures contaminants at their highest concentrations. Source capture solutions are particularly useful in processes where contaminants are produced at identifiable, consistent locations, such as welding stations, soldering benches, or specific machinery.
  • Ambient Capture: Ambient capture, also known as general ventilation or ambient air filtration, involves treating the air in an entire area or building. This method uses large air cleaners or dust collection systems with filtration to remove pollutants after they have dispersed into the workplace environment. While effective at improving overall air quality, it is generally less efficient at capturing high concentrations of contaminants compared to source capture. It is also not efficient at capturing heavier particulates that tend to fall out of the ambient air. Ambient fume collection systems are ideal for collecting light, airborne particulate in environments where contaminants are dispersed or where source capture is impractical due to the nature of the work or layout constraints.
Learn more: Complete Guide to Ambient Air Filtration

Filter or Exhaust?

Both ambient and source capture methods may be further distinguished by whether they use filtration vs. exhaust. Exhaust systems work by simply venting contaminants to the outside, while air filtration (dust collection) systems filter contaminants out of the air before venting or returning to the facility. In most industrial environments with heavy or toxic contaminants, filtration is the best choice.

Ambient vs. Source Capture: Making the Choice

The choice between ambient and source capture systems depends on the type, volume and hazard level of the contaminants, where contaminants are generated, and the layout of the facility. In many industrial settings, a combination of both ambient and source capture systems is often employed to achieve optimal air quality and ensure compliance with health and safety standards. This integrated approach leverages the strengths of each method to effectively control airborne contaminants.

Table: Ambient Air Filtration vs. Source Capture – Pros, Cons & Applications

Ambient Air Filtration Source Capture
Definition Treats air across an entire area or building Captures contaminants directly at the point of origin
Pros
  • Improves overall air quality in large areas
  • Enhances worker comfort and safety
  • Can handle dispersed contaminants
  • Ductless systems are highly versatile and adaptable, eliminating costly ductwork
  • More energy efficient than ambient capture systems, as less air must be moved
  • Quickly captures highly toxic chemicals at their point of origin, preventing spread throughout the workplace
  • Effective at keeping contaminants out of the breathing zone, which reduces health risks and penalties associated with PEL violations
Cons
  • Less efficient at capturing high concentations of contaminants or heavier particulates
  • Can be energy intensive, as it requires moving larger volumes of air
  • Might not fully eliminate localized high concentrations of pollutants
  • Might not keep contaminants out of the breathing zone for compliance with Permissive Emissions Limits (PELs)
  • Does not filter additional contaminants in the facility outside the main point source(s)
  • Can potentially interfere with work processess
  • May be difficult to implement in facilities with restrictive floor space or other constraints (e.g., overhead cranes, etc.)
  • Can be difficult to implement with very large processes (e.g., large weldments)
Best Applications
  • Light, airborne contaminants
  • Lower volume/lower hazard contaminants or areas where humans are not exposed
  • Warehouses
  • Facilities where source capture is impractical due to space or process constraints
  • High volume/high hazard contaminants where human exposures are a concern
  • Welding stations/soldering benches
  • Specific machinery and processes where emissions are concentrated
  • Heavier particulate that does not remain airborne

Need help choosing between source capture and ambient systems?

Talk to a RoboVent Solution Engineer

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Want to learn more? Talk to a dust, mist and fume expert today by filling out the fields below.